Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:19

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
NASA robot for drilling on icy moons tested on Alaskan glacier - Ars Technica
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Neuroscience breakthroughs: Surprising truths about memory revealed in 7 recent studies - PsyPost
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Qantas to close low-cost arm Jetstar Asia - CNN
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
PlayStation Plus free open-world RPG is 3 times the size of Skyrim - GAMINGbible
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Checkers Sweep Laval to Earn Trip to Calder Cup Finals - Charlotte Checkers Hockey
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Which spiritual Baba is the richest in India?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?